Despite ongoing Laddu and other controversies within the TTD, the former EO Dharma Reddy, once known for his authoritative control, remains silent. His refusal to speak out is puzzling.
Similarly, Dhanunjaya Reddy, who once enjoyed power during ruling YCP, has chosen to remain quiet, even if the government loses power.
I-PAC Rishiraj, previously influential in party decisions, is also conspicuously absent, raising questions about his current stance.
The lack of vocal support from such key figures, despite ongoing conflicts, has left the party struggling to maintain its image.
With no one to speak up except social media, often criticized as ineffective, the situation highlights a deeper issue.
Over-reliance on a few people like Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy while sidelining experienced leaders and officials has weakened the party's administrative strength. If this continues, it could pose significant challenges for Jagan and his leadership.
The person who should have addressed the press regarding the Tirumala Laddu controversy remains silent, while unrelated individuals are speaking out.
Furthermore, Jagan Mohan Reddy should have come forward to reassure the public that nothing inappropriate occurred in the matter of Tirumala Laddu, by holding an exclusive press meet on the topic. His explanation should be strong enough to erase all kinds of doubts.
It’s a pity that he addressed the press but spoke about many things unrelated to the Tirumala issue. He discussed the 100-day rule of Chandrababu Naidu, which holds no interest for the public, when the burning topic is only about Tirumala Laddu Prasadam.
The problem is that Jagan Mohan Reddy is surrounded by poor scriptwriters who have no idea what should be discussed and what should not be at an appropriate time by the party chief.